Reference code: | PT/FB/BL-2004-104.06 |
Location: | Arquivo PCA - Pasta 6/2004
|
Title:
| Reexamining psychokinesis
|
Publication year: | 2006
|
URL:
| http://psycnet.apa.org/journals/bul/132/4/529/
|
Abstract/Results: | H. Bösch, F. Steinkamp, and E. Boller's (see record 2006-08436-001) review of the evidence for psychokinesis confirms many of the authors' earlier findings. The authors agree with Bösch et al. that existing studies provide statistical evidence for psychokinesis, that the evidence is generally of high methodological quality, and that effect sizes are distributed heterogeneously. Bösch et al. postulated the heterogeneity is attributable to selective reporting and thus that psychokinesis is "not proven." However, Bösch et al. assumed that effect size is entirely independent of sample size. For these experiments, this assumption is incorrect; it also guarantees heterogeneity. The authors maintain that selective reporting is an implausible explanation for the observed data and hence that these studies provide evidence for a genuine psychokinetic effect.
|
Accessibility: | Document does not exist in file
|
Language:
| eng
|
Notes:
| meta-analysis; parapsychology; psychokinesis; random number generator |
Author: | Radin, D.
|
Secondary author(s):
| Nelson, R. D., Dobyns, Y., Houtkooper, J.
|
Document type:
| Editorial material
|
Number of reproductions:
| 2
|
Reference:
| Radin, D. I., Nelson, R. D., Dobyns, Y., & Houtkooper, J. (2006). Reexamining psychokinesis. [Peer commentary on the paper "Examining psychokinesis: The interaction of human intention with random number generators -A meta-analysis"by H. Bösch, F. Steinkamp, & E. Boller]. Psychological Bulletin, 132(4), 529-532. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.132.4.529
|
2-year Impact Factor: | 12.725|2006
|
Times cited: | 23|2024-02-05
|
Indexed document: | Yes
|
Quartile: | Q1
|
Keywords: | Parapsychology / Psychokinesis (PK) / Meta-analysis / Random number generator
|
|